The German parliament is set to vote on same-sex marriage on Friday.
The bill, which would give same-sex couples full marital rights and the ability to adopt children, was added to the agenda today after a vote.
With Chancellor Angela Merkel indicating that she will make the vote one of conscience, rather than one divided along party lines, the bill is expected to pass comfortably.
Schulz tweeted yesterday morning: “We will push through marriage equality in Germany. This week.”
The journey towards a vote on same-sex marriage has been slow, then has happened all at once following Merkel’s unexpected decision to open the floodgates earlier this week.
Her muted declaration at an event with women’s magazine Brigitte that she favoured a free vote on the issue was a tremendous departure from her old position that equal marriage risked “the well-being of children.”
Potential coalition partners had also moved to make equal marriage a condition of helping to keep Merkel’s right-wing Christian Democrats in power after September’s federal election.
One by one, the Greens, the Left Party, and – most significantly – the centre-left junior partner in Merkel’s grand coalition, the Social Democratic Party, have made their positions clear.
The political and popular pressure was pushing down on Merkel to abandon a conservative pillar of German society and follow in the steps of other progressive western countries.
But she had never relented before – so why now? Why is it suddenly possible that same-sex couples could be able to marry by the end of the week?
Turns out, it was as simple as meeting some actual same-sex parents, and just talking to them.
Speaking at the event with Brigitte, she recalled: “I had a life-changing experience in my home constituency,” according to the LA Times.
She told the audience that she had been invited to dinner with a lesbian couple who were looking after eight foster children.
The Chancellor saw that the children were well cared for, and realised that her beliefs, and those of her party, were unfounded.
“If the youth welfare service entrusts a lesbian couple with eight foster children, then the state could no longer use child welfare as an argument against adoptions,” Merkel said.
Of course, this may just be a story for the Chancellor to use in order to sidestep the alternative: that widespread pressure has made it politically impossible for her to resist any longer.
Thomas Jaeger, a political scientist at Cologne University, said as much to the LA Times.
“Merkel switched her position now to prevent the [political opposition] from attacking her on it in the campaign.”