
JERSEY CITY, NJ —
August 21, 2026 |
By DailyHudson Staff
New tax collector faces residency questions and a large PILOT backlog as the council splits 5-1 with three abstentions.
It was nearly midnight when the council finally got to the tax collector appointment. After almost six hours of budget talk, the vote came down to a single name: Sean Nolan. Ward B Councilman Joel Brooks said it best — short and simple: “I vote aye, congratulations Mr. Nolan.” Then the questions started, and what should have been a routine approval turned into something far more interesting.
Nolan is no stranger to the job. He’s served as tax collector in Passaic and Sayreville. But he doesn’t live in Jersey City, and that’s where things get complicated.
Councilman at-Large Michael Griffin was the first to raise an eyebrow. He abstained, saying, “I’m gonna abstain only because with 300,000 residents, I believe we didn’t search hard enough within our city. This is no knock to Mr. Nolan, I’m pretty sure he’s qualified.” That prompted Councilman at-Large Rolando Lavarro to ask the question that hung over the whole discussion: Does the tax collector have to live in Jersey City? Corporation Counsel Sarah Levine admitted she wasn’t sure off the top of her head, and that uncertainty set off a chain reaction.
A residency rule that no one could confirm
For anyone who hasn’t been following city hall closely, here’s the backstory. In April, the city announced it would seek residency waivers for at least three top officials. By May, the council had approved waivers for eight employees. The tax collector and tax assessor both have residency requirements under city code — Assistant Business Administrator Peter Horton pointed that out at a May 4th caucus meeting. But last night, that seemed to get lost in the shuffle.
Lavarro, who has a reputation for asking the tough questions, made his position clear: “That’s not gonna change my position on this, but if he is required, just like the previous appointees, a waiver is required in order to do that, I’d assume.” He abstained, partly because he felt the city was overlooking local talent. “We’ve got talent here in Jersey City and frankly a lot of good talent has left the city,” he said. “We should be trying to find ways to retain talent, but also retain institutional knowledge.”
Council President Denise Ridley agreed with him. She remembered the tax collector being on that residency list and abstained, saying, “I would prefer to do the waiver at the same time, so we don’t have a situation like we did last time where we confirm someone, and then later have to go back and do the waiver.”
What this means for Jersey City taxpayers
At the heart of the concern is a massive workload. Lavarro pointed out that Nolan told the council about 25 PILOT agreements he oversaw in Passaic, which led to 11 audits over three years. In Jersey City, there are over 140 PILOT and tax abatement deals in the pipeline, many requiring audits every five years. That’s a huge difference in scale. PILOT agreements — payments in lieu of taxes — are deals that let developers pay a fixed amount instead of regular property taxes. They’re often controversial because they can mean less revenue for the city’s schools and services.
Add to that the payroll tax, which Lavarro noted Nolan didn’t address when he spoke at the caucus meeting. So the new collector has a full plate: collect taxes, oversee PILOT audits, and manage payroll tax — all while navigating a residency issue that could require a waiver later. For the average Jersey City resident, this all comes down to whether the city’s finances are being handled well. Tax abatements affect how much the city has to spend on things you care about — schools, police, road repairs. Having a tax collector who’s up to the job matters, but so does having someone who understands the local landscape.
Council split shows deeper concerns
Not everyone was on board. Ward F Councilman Frank Gilmore, who initially supported the appointment, changed his vote to no after hearing Levine explain that “the ordinance, as drafted, is largely silent as to what happens in the event an employee fails to obtain a waiver.” She called it “untested territory.” Gilmore didn’t want to be a part of that. His frustration was evident: “I don’t feel comfortable being in ‘uncharted territory.’”
So the final tally was 5-1, with three abstentions. Nolan gets the job, but the lack of clarity leaves a lingering question: What happens if the residency waiver doesn’t pass? Levine said it would be up to the council to consider amendments, but admitted there’s no clear path. For now, Nolan’s four-year term begins, and the city moves forward — with fingers crossed that this appointment doesn’t create legal headaches down the line.
What to watch for
Residents should keep an eye out for a residency waiver resolution in the coming weeks. If it comes up, it’ll likely be on the council agenda. The city also needs to address the broader issue of tax collector oversight, especially with over 140 PILOT deals that need auditing. Will the council push for more transparency? Will they fast-track the waiver? These are questions that will play out at future meetings.
The bottom line
Sean Nolan is Jersey City’s new tax collector. He’s got the credentials, but he also inherits a mountain of work and a question mark about where he lives. The council’s split vote shows that even in the final hour, there are real concerns about whether the city is doing right by its residents. For now, all we can do is watch, wait, and hope the mechanics of city government keep up with the promises it makes.
Source: Hudson County View














































